Spousal Privilege: ‘Til Litigation Do Us Part

For spouses who find themselves named as co-defendants, a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice is a warning about the limits of spousal privilege.  A convenient plot device in law dramas such as Law and Order, spousal privilege protects spouses from disclosing communications between them.  However, in Ontario, that privilege is limited …

Lending to Limited Partnerships: Lessons from the Cerieco Decision

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Ontario Securities Commission v. Bridging Finance Inc. et al. (for the purposes of this article, the “Cerieco decision”) arose out of a claims process in the receivership related to the collapse of Bridging Finance Inc. While the broader litigation and regulatory context was complex, the portion of …

The Partition Act: A Powerful Tool for Resolving Jointly Owned Property Disputes

In the recently released decision of Ross v. Luypaert, 2025 ONCA 236, the Ontario Court of Appeal reaffirmed that a co-owner of real estate can compel the sale of jointly owned property under the Partition Act. The only exception is where the opposing party can prove that such an application amounts to malicious, vexatious, or …

Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Limitation Periods for Loans, Gifts, and Estate Claims

The question of when a lawsuit can be commenced in Ontario seems pretty straightforward – in general, a plaintiff has two years from the date when the basis for a claim is (or should have been) discovered. It sounds simple enough, and oftentimes, it is. However, a few recent decisions from the Ontario Court of …

Court of Appeal Decides Fate of “Crypto King” $500,000 Deposit

In 2021, the self-proclaimed “Crypto King,” along with an associate, paid a $500,000 deposit to purchase a commercial real estate property to store their exotic car collection. The “Crypto King,” Aiden Pleterski, had received more than $40 million from investors who thought they were investing in cryptocurrency. The investors had never authorized Mr. Pleterski to …

Commercial Lease Modifications: Why Oral Agreements Don’t Hold Up in Court

Most people likely understand the risks of trying to rely on an oral agreement to vary the terms of a commercial lease. Nonetheless, parties often get into disputes over whether there was an oral agreement that varied the terms of a lease. A recent Ontario decision, Parkland Corporation v. Caledon Fuels Inc.[1], confirms the risk …

Dissent Rights and Shareholder Agreements – New Ruling Provides Guidance

Dissent rights, entrenched in most provincial corporate statutes, grant shareholders the power to contest significant corporate changes and compel the corporation to repurchase their shares at a fair market value. Central to the enforcement of these rights is the statutory framework, which can result in either an amicable valuation agreement or a court-mandated determination of …

When development deals go wrong, damages come in the form of land value, not lost profits

This column was originally published on RENX.ca. When a deal to buy and sell land for development goes awry, an innocent purchaser can sue for the damages suffered. However, in most cases, the measure of damages will be the difference between the purchase price of the land and the market value on the closing date. Lost …

Mass fraud, arson threats, murder, organized crime, kidnapping: What are the limits of ‘buyer beware’?

This column was originally published on RENX.ca. In an episode of The Simpsons in the late ’90s, Marge Simpson takes a job as a real estate agent to make some extra cash. She made her first sale by selling a big, reasonably priced home to the Flanders family. In her haste to close the deal and despite her …